LIBERTECH Foundation evaluates, validates and refers cases of non-consensual biophysical intervention on the nervous system. Technical documentation is provided by NeuroEthics Research Lab using PEM v11 methodology.
Technology-Facilitated Abuse (TFA) encompasses the use of digital technologies to harass, control, manipulate, threaten or surveil a person without their consent. IDDS (Directed Interference based on Sensitive Data) is a non-consensual technological intervention on a person's nervous system and neurocognitive system, guided by neurophysiological and sensitive data to produce precise effects on their behavior, perception or cognition.
Exposure to directed electromagnetic energy (DEW/HPM), microwave auditory effect (MAE-Frey), non-consensual transcranial stimulation. Documentable with SA-09 sensor and spectral analysis.
Algorithmic decision manipulation, systematic cognitive interference, coordinated sociotechnological harassment. Documentable through behavioral pattern analysis and structured digital records.
Instrumental pathologization, cognitive-behavioral surveillance, non-consensual experimentation, organized persecution. Documentable with actor analysis, incident records and forensic OSINT.
LIBERTECH acts as ethical gatekeeper: evaluates the merit of each case before referring it to the forensic laboratory. This guarantees independence between who reports and who certifies.
Technical documentation is carried out by NeuroEthics Research Lab using PEM v11 methodology. Clean forensic chain admissible before judges and prosecutors.
Observatory with cases from 8 countries. First standardized registry of subperceptual biophysical intervention in Latin America.
Before any technical referral, LIBERTECH evaluates each case under ethical, security and evidentiary viability criteria.
The case enters via form or direct contact. A case code is assigned.
The Ethics Committee reviews consent, vulnerability and relevance of the account.
It is determined whether the case has grounds for technical referral or requires prior support.
If appropriate, the case is referred to NeuroEthics Research Lab for documentation with PEM v11 methodology.
Neurodynamic deviation with MW pattern documented via SA-09 and Forensic Logbook. Presented to Prosecution.
Frey effect documented with RFID spectrogram. Convergence with diplomatic literature.
L1+L2 pattern with coordinated sociotechnological harassment. Judicial expert report in preparation.
Your contribution funds the International Observatory, case documentation, free training for municipalities and the development of publicly accessible forensic tools.
LIBERTECH is a non-profit foundation with active legal entity in Chile. It issues donation certificates to individuals and legal entities.
• Case documentation in the TFA-IDDS Observatory
• Free training for municipal teams and system operators
• Development of forensic tools (Logbook, SA-09, SEA-PEM)
• Legislative agenda and neurorights in Latin America
📃 Suggested subject: Donation LIBERTECH — [your name] — [month/year]
Send receipt to contacto@liber-tech.org to receive donation certificate.
Current legal framework, neurotechnological damage typologies and applicable legal framing in Chile and internationally.
Neurorights protect the integrity of the nervous system, mental privacy and cognitive autonomy against technologies capable of intervening, monitoring or modifying brain processes without consent.
Chile was the first country in the world to enshrine neurorights at a constitutional level with Law 21.383 (2021). Law 21.719 (2024) on data protection incorporates neurological data as a special category.
The neurotechnology bill was rejected with a 6-7-0 vote. LIBERTECH actively participated in the legislative process. The regulatory debate continues.
Chile's new data protection law establishes reinforced obligations for those who process neurological or biometric data, with increased penalties for unlawful processing.
Directed attack using frequencies that interfere with individual neurodynamic signature. Documented with IDDS and SA-09 sensor by NeuroEthics Research Lab.
Frey effect (1961–62). Pulsed microwaves → thermoelastic expansion → auditory perception without sound source. Documented in Havana Syndrome.
Systematic mapping of the body's electromagnetic characteristics to identify individual resonance frequencies. Phase prior to directed attack.
Interference with decision-making processes through systematic exposure to content designed to modify cognitive states. Documentable through pattern analysis.
Documented effects by technology type, according to victim accounts and specialized literature.
| Type of damage | Technological mechanism | Perceived effects |
|---|---|---|
| Neurofunctional damage from electromagnetic exposure | Non-consensual DEW / HPM / EMP | Chronic headache · tinnitus · extreme fatigue · sleep disturbances · cranial pressure sensation |
| Illicit neurodata trafficking | Commercial BCI / wearables / digital platforms | Loss of cognitive privacy · behavioral profiling · preference manipulation · anxiety from perceived surveillance |
| Non-consensual cognitive interference | Transcranial stimulation / invasive BCI / entrainment | Mental confusion · difficulty concentrating · speech alteration · sudden mood changes · depersonalization |
| Pathologization as social neutralization | Instrumental psychiatric diagnosis / biased forensic reports | Social isolation · professional discredit · loss of custody · involuntary commitment · revictimization |
| Non-consensual cognitive-behavioral surveillance | Smart cities / facial recognition / targeted OSINT | Hypervigilance · situational paranoia · self-censorship · movement restriction · chronic stress |
| Non-consensual trials | Covert clinical or military experimentation | Multi-organ symptoms · neuropathic pain · internal burns · progressive cognitive deterioration · complex PTSD |
Discovered by Allan H. Frey in 1961–62: exposure to low-intensity pulsed microwaves generates auditory perception in the absence of a conventional sound source, through thermoelastic expansion in cranial tissues.
This mechanism has been linked to Havana Syndrome, which affected US and Canadian diplomatic personnel in Cuba (2016–17), China (2018) and other locations. NeuroEthics Research Lab documents civilian cases with this pattern using the SA-09 sensor and PEM methodology, through referral from Fundación LIBERTECH.
Forensic classification of damages documented by the foundation. The effects described come from structured victim accounts, specialized literature and TFA-IDDS Observatory records.
Neurotechnological damage operates in layers. Each layer produces different effects that accumulate over time, often without the victim identifying the cause. What begins as diffuse discomfort can evolve into chronic functional deterioration if not documented and addressed.
LIBERTECH classifies damage into three levels of impact that allow organizing evidence without exposing the complete forensic methodology:
Every typology presented here has a correlate in cases entered into the Observatory. Forensic details, measurement instruments and validation protocols reside in NeuroEthics Research Lab and are not published on this page.
The skull and brain are the primary impact zone in most documented cases. Effects vary according to the technology involved, frequency, intensity and duration of exposure.
Sensation of internal pressure, localized or migratory dull pain. Different from conventional tension headache: does not respond to standard analgesics. May be associated with pulsed MW exposure.
Auditory perception without sound source. Sharp, pulsating or variable tone. May coincide with the Frey Effect (pulsed microwaves → thermoelastic expansion). Present in most documented TFA cases.
Difficulty concentrating, "brain fog", short-term memory loss, verbal articulation problems. Effects that appear in clusters and subside when exposure ceases.
Insomnia without apparent medical cause, abrupt awakenings at regular times, non-restorative sleep, REM cycle alteration. One of the first and most consistent symptoms reported over time.
A recurring finding in Observatory cases is the presence of gastrointestinal symptoms that the victim does not initially associate with exposure. Scientific literature on the gut-brain axis sustains the plausibility of this connection.
Recurrent abdominal pain, nausea, altered intestinal transit, abdominal distension. Symptoms that appear in synchrony with documented exposure episodes and subside upon changing location or context.
Abrupt loss or increase in appetite, new food intolerances, significant weight change without dietary cause. Effects that may be secondary to induced chronic stress or direct interference with the enteric nervous system.
The vagus nerve directly connects the digestive system with the brainstem. Exposure to electromagnetic fields can alter intestinal motility, mucosal permeability and microbiome composition. These mechanisms are documented in peer-reviewed literature, although their relationship with directed attacks requires specific forensic research that NeuroEthics Lab is developing.
Cases with the longest follow-up time in the Observatory allow identifying evolution patterns. The following table summarizes the observed progression — without revealing the specific forensic indicators used by the PEM ecosystem.
| Phase | Estimated period | Observed effects | Layer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acute phase | 0 – 6 months | Tinnitus, headache, insomnia, anxiety, nausea. Symptoms the victim attributes to stress or environmental causes. | L0 |
| Consolidation phase | 6 – 24 months | Persistent brain fog, chronic fatigue, GI disturbances, progressive social isolation, first medical consultations without diagnosis. | L0 L1 |
| Chronic phase | 2 – 5+ years | Measurable cognitive deterioration, neuropathic pain, electromagnetic sensitization, complex PTSD, pathologization by health system, accumulated relational and occupational damage. | L0 L1 L2 |
| Neutralization phase | Variable | Instrumental psychiatric diagnosis, professional discredit, involuntary commitment, loss of support networks. Biophysical damage remains invisible behind the clinical label. | L2 |
Early recording with tools like the Forensic Logbook allows establishing the temporal correlation between exposure and symptoms before the health system intervenes with a diagnosis that, in many cases, closes the door to forensic investigation. Documenting from the first symptom is the difference between a validatable case and one that is lost.
The technologies we document were not designed for abuse — but they can be used for it. This section presents the framework LIBERTECH uses to identify, classify and contextualize these technologies without exposing forensic protocols.
A dual-use technology is one designed with a legitimate purpose — medical, scientific, defensive military, industrial — but which can be redirected for surveillance, control or harm to individuals without their consent.
The concept does not imply that all technology is dangerous. It implies that certain technologies lack sufficient safeguards to prevent their abusive use, and that current regulatory frameworks do not contemplate their potential for neurocognitive harm.
LIBERTECH does not reveal which specific technologies it documents in each case. What it presents here is the classification framework that allows organizing evidence and referring it to NeuroEthics Research Lab for forensic analysis.
Each category groups technologies with similar mechanisms of action. The cards present the domain and type of effect — not the specific models, manufacturers or state providers that the PEM ecosystem documents internally.
Systems that emit concentrated electromagnetic energy. From military area denial devices (ADS) to unregulated portable implementations. Documented by defense programs of the US, China and Russia.
Telecommunications infrastructure (antennas, repeaters, 5G/LTE networks) that, without visible modification, can be configured to emit patterns that interact with biological tissue. The telecommunication-brain nexus is the subject of document AT-11/TBCN.
Brain-computer interfaces (EEG, fNIRS) and stimulation devices (tDCS, TMS) commercially available without specific regulation. Can be instrumentalized for monitoring or interference without consent.
The home as a space of continuous exposure: IoT, WiFi networks, smart appliances, building materials that amplify or channel signals. Concept formalized in document AT-12/EBCI (Environmental BCI).
The phone as a cross-cutting vector that integrates sensing, emission and profiling. Concept from document AT-13/MBCI: the personal device amplifies the three pillars of the EBCI system.
Constellations with directed emission capability or high-resolution sensing. Territorial sovereignty and attribution framework covered in AT-14/SAT. The intersection with terrestrial telecommunications extends coverage risk.
Multiple defense programs have funded research in directed energy weapons and cognitive interference technologies. The following table presents only those referenced in public budget documents (.mil, .gov) — detailed files reside in the PEM ecosystem.
| Country / Agency | Domain | Public source |
|---|---|---|
| EE.UU. — DoD / DARPA / AFRL | DEW, HPM, neurotech, cognitive warfare | J-Books ASAFM, DARPA BAA, AFRL factsheets |
| Rusia — Ministerio de Defensa | Reflexive control, EW, psychotronics | Published military doctrine, Russian academic literature |
| China — PLA / CETC | Cognitive domain operations, DEW, military BCI | PLA publications, RAND reports, USCC documents |
| OTAN — ACT / Innovation Hub | Cognitive warfare as 6th operational domain | Cognitive Warfare Concept (2021), Allied Command Transformation |
The purpose of this page is for the victim, the legislator, the journalist and the judge to understand that these technologies exist, are documented and have state funding. The specific details — models, capabilities, chains of command, bilateral links — are matters of expert analysis and are found in the AT documents of the PEM ecosystem, available upon institutional request.
AI does not just automate processes — it transforms the very nature of neurotechnological harm. This section presents how the convergence between AI and dual-use technologies creates a scenario that current regulation does not contemplate.
Until recently, neurocognitive damage technologies required human operators, specialized equipment and physical proximity. AI integration changes all three variables simultaneously:
Attack automation: Systems that identify biometric patterns, adapt emission parameters and optimize effects without continuous human intervention. What previously required a trained operator can now be executed as an algorithmic process.
Scalability: AI allows a single system to affect multiple targets simultaneously, prioritizing, alternating and adapting in real time. The concept of "individual victim" transforms into "target population".
Opacity: The deep learning models that optimize these systems are black boxes. Forensic attribution — already difficult with conventional technology — becomes exponentially more complex when AI mediates between the operator and the effect.
Each link in the neurotechnological harm chain is enhanced by an AI component. The model is not linear — it is a cycle that feeds back and learns from the target.
IoT networks, mobile devices and environmental sensors feed AI models that identify the individual and characterize their electromagnetic environment. The home ceases to be a refuge and becomes an interface (→ AT-12/EBCI, AT-15/RTS).
Collected data builds a cognitive-behavioral digital twin of the target. ML algorithms predict physiological responses, tolerance thresholds and temporal vulnerability windows.
Directed energy systems, instrumentalized telecommunications or environmental modulation execute with AI-optimized parameters. Real-time feedback allows adjustment of frequency, intensity and cadence.
Generative AI produces cover narratives: medical reports that redirect to psychiatric diagnoses, discrediting content on social media, and manipulation of digital records. The victim faces a system that automatically delegitimizes them.
The AI-neurotechnology convergence is not a future scenario — it is operating today with commercially available technology. Current regulatory frameworks were not designed for this level of integration.
The following analytical documents — produced by NeuroEthics Research Lab — develop convergence mechanisms in depth. They are presented here as scope references; full content is available upon institutional request.
| Code | Document | AI Convergence |
|---|---|---|
| AT-09 | MAE / Frey Effect Technical Sheet | AI in modulation of pulsed MW emission parameters |
| AT-11/TBCN | Telecommunications-Brain Connectivity Nexus | Telecom infrastructure as AI vector for cognitive targeting |
| AT-12/EBCI | Environmental BCI | AI orchestrating the three pillars (RF, MAG, SAW) of the residential environment |
| AT-13/MBCI | Mobile BCI | Mobile device as AI node amplifying the EBCI system |
| AT-15/RTS | Residential Targeting & Sensing | AI in the sensing→targeting cycle within the home |
| CWLA | Cognitive Warfare in Latin America | AI as capacity multiplier in regional cognitive warfare |
This page shows the convergence framework and the questions that science policy must answer. Technical details — models, thresholds, forensic evidence — reside in the PEM ecosystem and are shared in expert, academic or institutional contexts. If you represent an institution and need access, contact us.
Visualización cruzada de ambas líneas presupuestarias: frecuencias operativas, crecimiento paralelo y superposición tecnológica.
Las bandas 900 MHz – 5.8 GHz son operativas tanto para DEW como para activación de nano-dispositivos IoBNT. Misma física, distinta narrativa presupuestaria.
El crecimiento presupuestario militar (BRDEE $106.1M, FY2019) y la expansión regulatoria biomédica (SoHO 2024) convergen temporalmente. Fuentes: ASAFM J-Books, UE.
Los dominios neural y ocular operan en la zona de superposición: potencias alcanzables tanto por DEW como por energy harvesting IoBNT. Fuentes: DIRD, IEEE, Kamal et al. 2026.
| RF-BIO COUPLING | NANO-DEVICES | BIO-DATA | TELECOM INFRA | DIGITAL TWIN | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEW / HPM / MAE | ●●● | ●○○ | ●●○ | ●●● | ●●○ |
| IoBNT / Nanomed | ●●● | ●●● | ●●○ | ●●○ | ●●● |
| ATMP / SoHO | ●○○ | ●●● | ●●● | ●○○ | ●●○ |
| BIOTCEL / ONT | ●○○ | ●●○ | ●●● | ●○○ | ●●● |
| AFRL / BRDEE | ●●● | ●○○ | ●●○ | ●●● | ●●○ |
La diagonal de alta superposición (RF-BIO + NANO + BIO-DATA + TELECOM + DIGITAL TWIN) define un sistema integrado que ninguna línea presupuestaria individual revela.
International observatory of IDDS cases · Visible digital surveillance (PI) + invisible biophysical interference (PEM)
Before any technical referral, LIBERTECH evaluates each case under ethical, security and evidentiary viability criteria.
LIBERTECH acts as an ethical gatekeeper: it is not the technical laboratory, but the entity that decides whether a case meets the conditions for referral to NeuroEthics Research Lab for professional documentation.
The case enters via form or direct contact. A case code is assigned and a confidential file is opened.
The Ethics Committee reviews consent, vulnerability and relevance of the account. Context and plausibility are evaluated.
It is determined whether the case has grounds for technical referral or requires prior support.
If appropriate, the case is referred to NeuroEthics Research Lab for documentation using PEM v11, SA-09 or SEA-PEM methodology.
If you are a victim of technology abuse or non-consensual neurotechnological intervention, your process begins here. LIBERTECH evaluates, validates and documents your case with forensic methodology. You can also participate as a professional, academic or allied institution.
Your case matters. LIBERTECH exists to validate, document and provide forensic support to victims of neurotechnological harm.
Who is this for? Individuals experiencing symptoms compatible with non-consensual neurotechnological intervention: atypical tinnitus, sleep disturbances, somatic dysregulation, electronic harassment or other documentable effects.
What do I receive? Free ethical and forensic evaluation. If your case has merit, it is referred to NeuroEthics Research Lab for technical documentation with PEM v11.
Anyone interested in neurorights and technology governance. No training requirement.
Lawyers, engineers, scientists, doctors, journalists, human rights experts, AI researchers.
Profile: Professionals, institutional teams, legal operators, municipalities, media. With certification and professional fee.
Profile: General public, neighborhood associations, social organizations, territorial communities. No prior training required.
Profile: Organizations, academic institutions, international bodies, research centers and companies that wish to co-produce public policy, standards or regulatory frameworks.
Operates by direct institutional agreement — contact the foundation.
✎ Levels are not exclusive or rigid. A person can start as an Adherent and evolve toward the Academic Network. An organization can participate in Training and simultaneously in the Think Tank.
✎ Enrollment does NOT include mandatory fees at levels 1–3. Level 4A has a professional training fee; level 4B may be free or low cost depending on available municipal or community funding.
You complete the form. LIBERTECH receives and evaluates the ethical and forensic merit of the case.
LIBERTECH assigns a case code to begin the initial evaluation. Depending on the results, it assigns tentative typology and determines whether the case has grounds for technical referral.
If appropriate, the case is referred to NeuroEthics Research Lab for technical documentation with PEM v11, SA-09 or SEA-PEM.
The case is registered with the possibility of advancing toward judicial admissibility through validacion.liber-tech.org.
Autonomous incident recording: audio, FFT spectrogram, guardian mode. liber-tech.org/bitacora
RF/MW environmental sensor for electromagnetic exposure documentation. MAE module included.
The LIBERTECH team will review your report and contact you. All data is treated with confidentiality.
LIBERTECH provides these free tools so that anyone can begin recording and documenting their experience in a structured way.
Free version of the electromagnetic exposure monitor. Allows recording environmental exposure patterns and generating basic reports with timestamp and geolocation.
Access Monitor →Structured incident recording platform with forensic value. Includes audio capture, FFT spectrogram, registration of involved actors and guardian mode for emergencies.
Access Logbook →💡 These tools are a first step. If the results from Monitor Light or the Logbook suggest consistent patterns, you can request a Layer 0 evaluation for technical referral with professional instruments (SA-09, PEM v11).
Programs for system operators: doctors, lawyers, experts, police, prosecutors and officials who need to understand and act on cases of neurotechnological harm.
120 hours online + in-person. Aimed at lawyers, doctors and experts. LIBERTECH institutional certification and access to the SEA-PEM module of NeuroEthics Research Lab. Tentative date: Q1 2027.
How to identify symptoms, correctly refer cases and what to record. Aimed at primary health centers and rights protection offices.
Legal framework of neurorights, PEM methodology as expert tool, judicial admissibility and use of the validacion.liber-tech.org module.
Directory of mental health professionals trained to support individuals with the symptoms documented in the Observatory. Chile · Spain.
Complaint reception protocol, chain of custody for biophysical evidence, coordination with the LIBERTECH admissibility module.
PEM ecosystem technical library, academic papers, policy briefs for legislators and reference documents in the neurorights-neuroethics field.
Chilean foundation for ethical validation and neurorights defense. Ethical gatekeeper for cases of non-consensual biophysical intervention, in alliance with NeuroEthics Research Lab.
Fundación LIBERTECH acts as an ethical gatekeeper for cases of neurotechnological harm: evaluates the merit of each situation, establishes whether there are grounds to initiate forensic documentation, and refers to the corresponding technical laboratory.
Technical documentation — PEM v11 application, SA-09 sensor operation, expert reports — is the exclusive responsibility of NeuroEthics Research Lab SpA, an independent allied laboratory. This separation guarantees the integrity of the forensic chain in any judicial process.
An organization that denounces and certifies its own methodology is exposed as "judge and party." The LIBERTECH (ethics) + NeuroEthics Lab (technical) architecture produces a forensic chain that withstands judicial challenge: they are distinct entities with distinct roles.
Operating laboratory for PEM v11 · SA-09 · SEA-PEM · Forensic Logbook. Handles LIBERTECH referrals and direct professional consultations. neuroethics.cl
Active and developing institutional collaborations
Interdisciplinary Center for Ethics, Politics and Economics — Affiliated member since April 2025.
Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness — Regular member.
Rafael Yuste, Columbia University — Founding organization of the neurorights field.
National Institute of Human Rights — Institutional liaison.
Co-authorship in publications, access to Observatory data for research, PEM methodology review. For researchers and academics.
Training, referral network and access to the admissibility module. For lawyers, experts, doctors, psychologists, prosecutors and police.
Legislative agenda, policy briefs, participation in international forums. For organizations, foundations, donors and legislators.
Voluntary independent peer review body. Validates case admission criteria, supervises the methodological coherence of the Observatory and acts as a bridge between the foundation and civil society.
LIBERTECH is the ethical gatekeeper for cases. The Ethics Committee is the gatekeeper's gatekeeper: an independent collegiate body that reviews whether admission criteria are fair, whether the Observatory operates rigorously, and whether the foundation acts in coherence with its mission.
This three-layer architecture — NeuroEthics Lab (technical) · LIBERTECH (ethical validation) · Ethics Committee (independent oversight) — is what makes the forensic chain withstand judicial, academic and media scrutiny.
Committee members do not receive fees. Their contribution is their name, judgment and network. In return, they participate in the body that defines the ethical standards of the first Latin American forensic framework for neurotechnological harm.
Researchers in neuroscience, biophysics, AI, bioethics or technology law. With publications or verifiable institutional affiliation. They provide methodological rigor and academic credibility.
Human rights lawyers, prosecutors, judges or judicial experts with experience in fundamental rights, personal integrity or technology crimes. They provide admissibility and procedural perspective.
Human rights organizations, investigative journalists, digital activists or NGOs with a track record in civil liberties or technology. They provide social legitimacy and reach.
Documented and resolved cases who wish to contribute from their experience. The perspective of those who lived through the harm is irreplaceable so that Committee criteria are not purely technical. Participation with reserved identity if preferred.
Selected members of the Fundación LIBERTECH Ethics Committee. The Committee operates as an independent collegiate body.
The LIBERTECH Ethics Committee continues to expand. We seek between 5 and 9 founding members from different disciplines and countries in Latin America and Europe.
Application received. We will review your profile and contact you shortly.
Your contribution funds the International Observatory, case documentation, free training for municipalities and the development of publicly accessible forensic tools.
LIBERTECH is a non-profit foundation with active legal entity in Chile. It issues donation certificates to individuals and legal entities.
• Case documentation in the TFA-IDDS Observatory
• Free training for municipal teams and system operators
• Development of forensic tools (Logbook, SA-09, SEA-PEM)
• Legislative agenda and neurorights in Latin America
We publish an annual funds usage report. Each donation goes entirely to the operation of the Observatory and the foundation's free tools.
📃 Suggested subject: Donation LIBERTECH — [your name] — [month/year]
Send receipt to contacto@liber-tech.org to receive donation certificate.
For institutional inquiries, alliances, press and professional referrals. If you need to report a case, use the Enrollment module.
Message received. We will respond shortly.
If you experience symptoms or need forensic documentation, use the Enrollment module.
